Armyanskii ln., 4-2, Moscow, 101000, Russia


Mikhail Pokhoday1, Andriy Myachykov1,2
  • 1 National Research University Higher School of Economics, 20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation
  • 2 Northumbria University, 2 Ellison Pl, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK

Effects of Auditory and Visual Cueing of Attention on Syntactic Choice in Sentence Production

2018. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 209–221 [issue contents]

One of the topics in current psycholinguistic research is the study of the factors affecting syntactic choice in sentence production. Previous research suggests that syntactic choice results from an interplay between linguistic and non-linguistic factors, and a speaker’s attention to the elements of a described event represents one such factor. It is a well-established fact that our attention simultaneously receives input from various attentional modalities (e.g. auditory, motor, olfactory, etc.). Afterwards, attention filters the input by a number of factors (e.g. saliency) and allocates resources to the most prominent and important input at a given moment. This poses the question of whether other attentional modalities affect syntactic choice in a similar manner to visual modality. In this study we aimed to understand whether auditory and visual attention can affect syntactic choice. English native speakers described drawings of simple transitive events while their attention was directed to the location of the agent or the patient of a depicted event by means of either an auditory (monaural beep) or a visual (red circle) explicit lateral cue. We have measured the amount of passive structures produced. Our results were not significant, however there was a visible trend in visual cueing condition. In this paper we discuss possible reasons for such outcomes.

Citation: Pokhoday M., Myachykov A. (2018) Effekty vizual'nogo i auditornogo markirovaniya vnimaniya na sintaksicheskiy vybor pri porozhdenii predlozheniy [Effects of Auditory and Visual Cueing of Attention on Syntactic Choice in Sentence Production]. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, vol. 15, no 2, pp. 209-221 (in Russian)
Rambler's Top100 rss