@ARTICLE{26583223_26983961_2007, 
	author = {E. Klimov}, 
	keywords = {},
	title = {Is It not the Time to Reflect on «Language Despotism» in Psychology?},
	journal = {Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics},
	year = {2007},
	volume = {4},
	number = {2},
	pages = {48-55},
	url = {https://psy-journal.hse.ru/en/2007-4-2/26983961.html},
	publisher = {},
	abstract = {Lots of «stock phrases» are used in the professional language of psychologists. They may give rise to associations and ideas that lead to an inadequate understanding of a subject. Although such stock phrases are usually clear to psychologists, they may mislead representatives of other scientific areas. The author gives a number of examples of such «ambiguous» terminology and calls the professional community to discuss the issue of its possible withdrawal from usage and replacing it with more pithy statements.},
	annote = {Lots of «stock phrases» are used in the professional language of psychologists. They may give rise to associations and ideas that lead to an inadequate understanding of a subject. Although such stock phrases are usually clear to psychologists, they may mislead representatives of other scientific areas. The author gives a number of examples of such «ambiguous» terminology and calls the professional community to discuss the issue of its possible withdrawal from usage and replacing it with more pithy statements.}
}