@ARTICLE{26583223_27497149_2005, 
	author = {A. Yurevich}, 
	keywords = {},
	title = {Militant Romanticism},
	journal = {Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics},
	year = {2005},
	volume = {2},
	number = {1},
	pages = {124-129},
	url = {https://psy-journal.hse.ru/en/2005-2-1/27497149.html},
	publisher = {},
	abstract = {Responding to Allakhverdov’s article in this volume, the author calls him a «romantic psychologist». «Romantic psychologists» [the term was introduced by A.R. Luria] are deeply concerned with the «eternal» philosophical or methodological issues. Yet the author finds discrepancies in the article in question: contradictory claims, imperatives that are too hard, and confusion between postmodernism, phenomenology, irrationality and anti-scientism.},
	annote = {Responding to Allakhverdov’s article in this volume, the author calls him a «romantic psychologist». «Romantic psychologists» [the term was introduced by A.R. Luria] are deeply concerned with the «eternal» philosophical or methodological issues. Yet the author finds discrepancies in the article in question: contradictory claims, imperatives that are too hard, and confusion between postmodernism, phenomenology, irrationality and anti-scientism.}
}